Talk: Commons-Oriented Open Cooperative Governance Model V 1.0: Difference between revisions

From Guerrilla Media Collective Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Supporters: new section)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Members beyond the Testing Phase ==
'''NOTE: If you're not a Guerrilla Translator, but part of the Hervás meeting, please comment on the model [https://www.loomio.org/d/pVDnaJyL/the-open-coop-governance-model in this Loomio thread]. Thanks!'''


In the intro, we say:
Discussion for the model has been moved to four Loomio threads covering the main sections:


<blockquote>(... María) ...In fact, she could spend all of her time just doing agency/livelihood work, and it would still benefit the pro-bono/love side and vice versa.</blockquote>
* '''[https://www.loomio.org/d/j9oBdUCk/gov-model-the-open-coop-governance-model-in-guerrilla-translation The Open Coop Governance Model in Guerrilla Translation]'''
* '''[https://www.loomio.org/d/VaZ3G5mW/gov-model-roles-and-responsibilities Roles and Responsibilities]'''
* '''[https://www.loomio.org/d/qwTBO1vs/gov-model-decision-making-processes Decision making processes]'''
* '''[https://www.loomio.org/d/K0qzwTuM/gov-model-credits-contribution-tracking Credits: Contribution tracking]'''


Meaning that full members, as long as they get 400 credits, regardless of whether they're livelihood or love, meet the minimum quarterly requirements. But should they obligatorily get 400 LOVE credits, anyway?
As there are various subtopics inside the thread please hit "reply" to open a "sub-discussion" of sorts under the relavant topic. However, you must have the thread set to "nested" (as opposed to chronological). This is chosen in the drop-down menu at the top of the thread.
 
'''Pros:''' That would ensure no shortage of pro-bono translations being published online
'''Cons:''' It may take away time from paid work, which the collective needs.
 
Maybe there's a halfway, or negotiated solution (or we determine a general pro-bono quota which, when met, exempts those full members from having to accrue 400 love credits (and just present the equivalent or more in Livelihood credits). Or we cut the pro-bono quota to 200 for full members? The important thing is that the commons is never starved.
 
== Supporters ==
 
<blockquote>Supporters can engage with Guerrilla Translation through email or social media but, preferably, through an open Loomio group for that purpose. In time strategies can be studied to use the Loomio group for polls etc,</blockquote>
 
What would this Loomio group look like? What discussions and consultations would be initiated there? How can trolling be prevented?

Latest revision as of 08:09, 9 July 2018

NOTE: If you're not a Guerrilla Translator, but part of the Hervás meeting, please comment on the model in this Loomio thread. Thanks!

Discussion for the model has been moved to four Loomio threads covering the main sections:

As there are various subtopics inside the thread please hit "reply" to open a "sub-discussion" of sorts under the relavant topic. However, you must have the thread set to "nested" (as opposed to chronological). This is chosen in the drop-down menu at the top of the thread.